Meanwhile With Trevor
Books • Fitness & Health • Food • Lifestyle • Movies • Culture
My Top 3 Jack Reacher Novels (And One I Hate)
March 02, 2023

I used to say after every Jack Reacher novel that I wouldn’t read another one. That may not sound like a ringing endorsement of the series, but noticed the qualifier. I “used” to say that. The fact is, I’d finish one novel, say I was done, and after a few months I’d see another at a used bookstore, pick it up, and inevitably read it. Now that I have more than half the series on my shelf, I’ve resigned myself to the fact that I’m probably going to read them all.

There are worse things.

Author Lee Child doesn’t plan his stories, and it shows. Some of the books are drastically better than others. Some have tight plots. Some spend too much in search of a plot. And as the last of the blockbuster novelists, he can get away with it. So his clear refusal to plan too far ahead is a problem. What he does do, which I admire, is agonize over his word choices. Since he got his start in TV writing, it makes sense that he wants his books to sound good. 

So who is Jack Reacher?

Jack Reacher is a one-man A-Team, except that instead of running from the Military Police he was one. In many ways he’s also a modern day Conan the Barbarian, an impossibly huge man (in one book, he builds up his pecs so much he’s basically bulletproof) who travels the countryside providing aid through the most violent means imaginable. He sometimes beds beautiful women, but never stays in one place long enough to have a real relationship. 

Reacher is a red-blooded man’s fantasy.

With nearly 30 books and short stories out there, I’m not sure how many I have read. When I worked in a library I used to listen to Reacher novels while shelving books, and after a certain point they all started to blend together (though I still remember where I was working when I heard certain things). You don’t need to go through them order, either, and that scattershot approach has my memory muddled.

As I said, some are better than others. So here are three that I’ve read more than once.

Killing Floor

The first is often the best, and this one was written when Lee Child was hungry. It’s probably the most carefully plotted of the series, taking Reacher on his first out-of-the-Army adventure in a small town when he's arrested for muder and stumbles into a counterfiting operation. And it gets personal. It's also unique in that it’s the only novel I’m aware of that’s written in first person. If the Amazon TV series adaptation (you can read my review here) was too gruesome for you, the book is even bloodier, so be forewarned. 

One Shot

You don’t need to completely put the Tom Cruise movie out of your head to enjoy this one, as it follows the book pretty closely. Well, except for the Tom Cruise part. This was the first Reacher novel I read and it clearly made a good impression. Reacher has to prove that the man confessing to an assassination isn't guilty. There’s a reason why it was picked as the first screen adaptation, as it provides an engaging introduction to the character and isn’t as horribly, horribly, violent as the first book.

61 Hours

This is a fun ticking clock adventure that puts Reacher in a cold environment. Actually, it’s more of a running out the clock, as Reacher needs to protect a woman for (you guessed it) 61 hours. It’s been awhile since I read this one, so my memory is a little hazy on the content. But the unique setting makes this a good one for snowy days.

Dishonorable mention: Without Fail

Book six reminds us that no author is without fails, and this book is a disaster. Reacher is pulled in to protect the Vice President from a Thanksgiving Day assassination. Maybe if I’m feeling like a completist I’ll read it again. But if you’re interested in the series and see this one at a yard sale, wait until you find something better.

community logo
Join the Meanwhile With Trevor Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Tuesday Update

New article is on the way, but I'm feeling too overwhelmed to crank it out.

00:01:17
Update!

I cover it in the the video, but I've got some new professional writing opportunities coming up and I'm trying to finish my next novel, all while navigating a change in schedule. So look for more pictures and videos, and new articles here on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

00:02:47
He Who Rides on the Clouds - Conclusion

Leo and Britt come face to face with a prehistoric god a new cult on Saturn. Can they save the children doomed to sacrifice and escape?

He Who Rides on the Clouds - Conclusion
He Who Rides on the Clouds - Part 2

Leo and Brittany have arrived on Saturn, but not in the way they'd hoped. Captured by a pagan cult, they don't have time to stop the unthinkable from happening. But they'll try anyway.

Content warning: language and sexual situations.

He Who Rides on the Clouds - Part 2
He Who Rides on the Clouds - Part 1

Star Wars is dead and the more apathy you show the faster it will be allowed to rest in peace.

Instead of griping about what Disney has done, why don't you listen to my space adventure story? He Who Rides on the Clouds is supernatural noir that spans space and time. When children on Mars go missing, Alexis Leonard and his ex-wife Brittany go looking. Their search leads them to a pagan temple and an ancient religion.

If you'd like to buy the story and read ahead, it's available in the Fall 2020 issue of Cirsova, available here: https://amzn.to/3yRRywY

He Who Rides on the Clouds - Part 1
No Posts This Week

Hey everyone, with BasedCon coming up this weekend I'm busy catching up on things and getting ready to go. But I'll be back next week with lots of new thoughts!

Big Changes Ahead

Hey Friends, I've got some big life changes on the horizon and should be able to create more content. What would you like to see? More fiction? More fitness? Maybe you'd like more video or audio content. Let me know in the comments.

Also, if you aren't a paid subscriber, what would get you to pay $5 a month?

Is Ladyballers Doomed from the Start?

The most honest analysis I've seen.

post photo preview
TV Review - Wild Cards

Back in the mid-00’s the USA Network said, “Characters welcome.” Shows like Monk, Burn Notice, White Collar, Psych, Royal Pains, and Suits filled the schedule and TV was, for a time, fun. The shows may not have had the most complex plots, but by the end of the episode you felt good about what you’d just seen. 

The colors were bright and the skies were blue.

But if you’ve looked at cable or network TV lately, things aren’t quite so cheerful. NCIS: Origins has a color grading best described as muddy, Tracker is somber, and even Matlock is more sour than sweet. Sure you can watch them as a family, but why would you? Even the 20 year old reruns of NCIS are more vibrant and feel-good than anything on TV now. And if you’re like me, you’ve got some of those episodes memorized.

Is there anything currently in production that recaptures that spirit early aughts?

Yes. Ironically, it’s from our neighbors to the north.

Wild Cards (available on Amazon Prime Video) is similar to White Collar in tone. Max (Vanessa Morgan) is a charismatic con artist working in a fictional Canadian city. Cole (Giacomo Gianniotti) is the straight-laced cop who catches her. In order to keep her out of jail and restore his position in the police department, they have to work together to solve crimes. That’s it. The show doesn’t even try to hide what it’s doing.

“We’re like Bones and that dude from Buffy… Castle and that hot girl… A Star is Born only you’re Lady Gaga and I’m Bradley Cooper.”

No, Max isn’t as smooth as White Collar’s Neal and Cole’s life isn’t as stable as Peter’s, since rather than a wife and house he has a cat (named Mark) and a houseboat. But the “can I or can I not trust you?” dynamic is the same. Their cases take them to all the usual places. We have the mystery on the set of a TV series plot, the trapped in a bank during a robbery plot, and the going under cover as a couple in need of therapy plot. We’ve seen it all before, but we haven’t seen these characters go through the paces, and that’s what makes it fun.

Even if you’re scrolling social media at the same time.

Is it family friendly? Well, Max has curves in all the right places and isn’t shy about showing them off, and sometimes the stories push the boundaries of good taste (with suggestive video and commentary to match). But overall, in fairly inoffensive. I’m not too worried about it going any further than it already has, and I hope Prime gets season two soon.

Because I like my skies blue.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Book Review - Levon's Trade by Chuck Dixon

One of last year’s most surprising movies was The Beekeeper, which was a big hit with those who saw it. Otherwise, it didn’t get much (wait for it) buzz. Together, director David Ayer and star Jason Statham made a serviceable action flick in the John Wick mold, but with some political intrigue and in a sillier (yet somehow more grounded) universe.

I liked it.

Now they’ve got a new movie coming out, A Working Man, and there are many reasons beyond their involvement that have me very interested. First, it’s based on a novel by Chuck Dixon, who admittedly isn’t someone with whom I was familiar until now. Apparently Dixon is mostly known for his work in the comics industry, writing stories for Batman and The Punisher, and for being outspoken about his politics. Given the not-so-subtle allusions to Hunter Biden in The Beekeeper, he and Ayer seem to be a good match.

Better yet, the screenplay was adapted by none other than Sylvester Stallone.

Yes, that Sylvester Stallone.

Given his political leanings, I don’t expect A Working Man to offend to me with messaging. This isn’t the first time Stallone has written for Statham, as he also penned the screenplay for Homefront, which I have yet to see but will soon. What I appreciate about Stallone’s writing is that mythic elements are always in the back of his mind. He thinks in epic terms even when the stories are small. 

Okay, but what about the story?

Yesterday I read the entire Chuck Dixon novel in about two hours. Levon’s Trade isn’t the most complex thriller out there, but a stripped down, fast-paced, tale of a violent man, Levon Cade, doing what he does best. When it opens Cade is working security at a construction site and establishes himself as someone you don’t mess with if you want to hold onto your teeth. The owner of the company’s daughter went missing after college finals, and since police and private investigators have failed, he turns to Cade for help.

Naturally, Cade refuses.

But he’s involved in a nasty custody battle over his little girl with the father of his late wife. Needing money to fight a battle that can’t be resolved with high powered weapons, he accepts. And once Cade takes on a task, he’s merciless in executing his mission. Turns out, the girl was taken by Ukrainian gangsters, who are just as merciless and even more cruel. Since the guy who took the girl is at the bottom, Cade starts at the top and begins dismantling the entire corrupt organization, digging his was down through the most violent means imaginable.

Maybe you don’t want to imagine, in which case this book isn’t for you.

By the last act it feels like Dixon is skimming over things, which isn’t to say he gets sloppy. Even the minor characters are given adequate backstories and key details are included to flesh out the world. It’s just that Cade is able to find his targets with a very convenient explanation that is left vague. This isn’t a complaint so much as an observation.

A Levon Cade novel is a Jack Reacher story with all the boring parts cut out. 

As for the movie, I think Statham will make for a good Levon Cade, even though the Cade of the novels is American, born and bred. Cade is described as “rangy” with a fighter’s scars around his eyes, and his demeanor is perfect for Statham’s screen personality. I honestly can’t think of a better actor, accent not withstanding. The novel doesn’t wrap up with a Hollywood bow, so it’ll be interesting to see how Stallone decided to handle that.

Overall, I’m looking forward to the movie and will likely read more in this series.

I suspect that A Working Man will be the sleeper hit of the year. 

Read full Article
Focus on Things That Are Great

I’m so thankful I’m not a film critic.

There are many in my online social circle who feel compelled to see every new release so that they can be critics. Today they might go see the latest superhero movie, tomorrow a self-indulgent character study that takes three and a half hours to say people are horrible, and then a musical over the weekend. Sometimes they might go in expecting to hate something and come out respecting it. More often than not, I imagine, they’re proven right.

Or, more likely, they have no strong feelings about the film.

It’s just meh.

Maybe the critics are the heroes we need. I certainly respect their work and dedication, while also being thankful that theirs is not my calling. For a few years I thought it might be, and I saw so many movies that I immediately forgot at best, and made me miserable for days at worst. Of course, I saw a few movies I loved. But those were movies I would’ve chosen to watch without any sort of obligation. 

Clint Eastwood’s masterful Richard Jewell comes to mind.

In a world overwhelmed by content, I’d rather watch movies that have stood the test of time. I know it’s cool to say that Casablanca isn’t that great. The fact that it’s been studied, praised, and screened countless times over the decades says otherwise. It may not be to your taste, but there’s no denying that it’s a great film and well worth your 102 minutes. I don’t like High Noon, at all, yet its significance is undeniable and I’m sure I’ll watch it again someday.

We have to know the past to talk about the present.

Too many online critics aren’t well-versed in the classics, and thus lack the knowledge and vocabulary to talk about the new stuff. There’s a popular YouTube channel with two engaging hosts that I want to love. I won’t name them, because I’m about to put them on blast. Their channel is split between reactions to older movies and talking about current movies and pop culture. Unfortunately, they know so little film history that their takes aren’t terribly helpful. 

Hopefully, as they continue going back and increasing their knowledge base, things will improve.

You’ll never be a better person for having seen “all the movies.” But if you can let me know that you understand the language and history of film, your commentary will be better and I’ll take your opinions more seriously. 

And if you want to tell good stories…

You can’t go wrong by studying the masters. Reviewing books and movies is fun but, again, it’s not my calling. I think I’m called to create. So I don’t need to see all of the uninspired, derivative content that’s filling the production pipeline. It’s more to my advantage to know what’s great and try to figure out why. Ideas can come from anywhere, anything. But great inspiration comes from great things.

So I want to focus on things that are great.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals